51精品视频

Tags
  • Innovation and Research
  • Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology
  • Department of Defense
Features & Articles

Research Takes Strides Toward Making Prosthetic Limbs More Comfortable

This story is adapted from the spring/summer 2018 issue of .

More than 2 million Americans live with some sort of limb loss, and while prosthetic devices help to restore function and improve quality of life, they can also create a new set of problems such as pressure sores and infection at the amputation site. These secondary complications reduce the likelihood that the amputee will wear the prosthetic device, further eroding the user鈥檚 ability to work or socialize.

, assistant professor in the within the , envisions a way to make artificial limbs more comfortable to wear and less likely to cause secondary complications.

In an innovative, two-year study by the U.S. Department of Defense, Fiedler is researching the comparative effectiveness of a new type of liner that fits into the prosthetic socket of artificial limbs for individuals with below-knee amputations.

鈥淭he current standard of care requires the use of a flexible liner made of silicon or polyurethane gel that is worn directly between the skin and the rigid wall of the prosthetic socket,鈥 explained Fiedler. 鈥淭he liner sticks to the skin and keeps the prosthesis from slipping off when the leg is lifted.鈥

However, one of the primary side effects of the liner is excessive sweating of the residual limb. When the skin sweats, it loses contact with the liner. It then rubs against the material with every step. After a while, the rubbing causes pain and damage to the skin.

But a new generation of prosthetic liners are infused with phase-change material 鈥 a material that 鈥渕elts鈥 from a solid phase into a liquid phase at a temperature slightly above normal skin temperature. The melting has a cooling effect on the skin聽and prevents sweating.

Donnie Krimm, who has worn an artificial limb for more than 10 years, participated in that compared the two types of liners.

鈥淎 liner is like a heavy rubber sock that you pull over your residual limb,鈥 said聽Krimm. 鈥淵ou can imagine how hot that can feel, especially in the summer months. But I was completely comfortable wearing the temperature-controlled liner, even when the temperature hit 90 degrees last August.鈥

Fiedler鈥檚 study is investigating whether the differences between liners can lead to any other tangible benefits for the user. For example, he鈥檚 studying whether聽users will be able to wear the artificial limb for longer periods during the day, or for more days in a row 鈥 or if they will experience any complications.

Study participants are being recruited in the 51精品视频sburgh and Philadelphia areas. 鈥淚t is important to have multiple sites for a study like this, mostly for logistical reasons,鈥 said Fiedler. 鈥淩ecruiting 50 eligible participants from a small area is almost impossible, but having multiple sites increases the chances of having conditions that are most representative of reality.

鈥淭here may not be a big difference in demographics or anthropometrics between eastern and western Pennsylvania,鈥 he said. 鈥淏ut there may well be differences in climate, as we have seen with this year鈥檚 winter storms on the East Coast. And climate is obviously a factor in our study on socket comfort.鈥

The double-blind, randomized study follows participants for 12 months, during which time they wear one type of liner for six months, then switch to the other. This allows them to wear both the conventional and phase-change material liners during hot and cold seasons.

The study tracks the number of days the prosthesis is used, the number of steps taken聽and other measures of activity. Participants also complete a standardized questionnaire to evaluate their experience.

Krimm reported that聽he was able to wear the phase-change material liner all day, every day, during the pilot study. 鈥淚t felt very natural, and I had no problems with sweat,鈥 he said.

According to Fiedler, the field of prosthetics does not often benefit from evidence-based research studies. The reason, he said, is simple: 鈥淎ll patients are different and one prosthesis does not look like the next. It鈥檚 virtually impossible to conduct randomized trials on prosthetic devices 鈥 but it is feasible to study liners, and that鈥檚 why we are excited about this study.鈥